Friday, May 30, 2025

Tubarc Conception (Saturday, March 25, 2006)

 



 Tubarc

(Tube + Arc)

Molecular Connectivity for DYNAMICS

Tubarc is a new conception in hydrodynamics from Hydrology as an enhanced porosity for fluid transmission allowing continuous lateral fluid movement to unsaturated hydraulic flow and anisotropy, which is a prevailing flow direction.

Tubarc suggests a replacement to capillarity which is associated to tube geometry and is inappropriate to portray void connectivity to random porosity for not matching to the pore geometry.

Tubarc offers high level of reliability since pores can be connected continuously with a prevailing flow direction very important to controlling hydrodynamic properties of fluids when moving by gradient of flow by adhesion-cohesion of solid phase.

Tubarc as a new proposed conception in hydrodynamics affects many applications associated to mass flow, porosity geometry, and molecular connectivity.

Tubarc is based on two important long standing scientific conceptions dealing with the hydrodynamics of fluids moving through porosity - Saturated and Unsaturated Hydraulic Zones:

1856 - Henry Darcy proposes the Darcy's Law for Saturated Hydraulic Zones

1907 - Edgard Buckingham proposes a change to Darcy's Law to adequate fluids moving on Vadose Zone which is the movement of water over the water table.

Tubarc allows a steady and reliable porosity for bulky composition ensuring that fluid can have a multidirectional flow and a prevailing longitudinal flow along the longitudinal segment of the fibers.

The advanced porosity employing Tubarc conceptions offer important features for controlling hydrodynamic properties important for fluid retention and conductions exploiting technological edges taking advantages of fluid matric gradient allowing self-sustaining flow for appropriate fluid delivery as well as fluid removal by molecular drainage.

Tubarc – High Precision of Fluid Delivery
(US 6,766,817 July, 27 2004)

Tubarc from advance Hydrogeology provides new conceptions in hydrodynamics as unsaturated hydraulic flow for High Precision of Fluid Delivery/Retention/Enhanced Porosity Geometry


Tubarc can be used for the following below:

1. Enhanced Geometric Porosity
2. Fluid Delivery/Retention
3. Reversible Self-Watering Potted Plants
4. Irrigation Under Demand

5. Molecular Drainage
6. Molecular Filtering
7. Self-Inking Writing Tools (pens, markers)
8. Self-Inking Printing Devices (printers, cartridges)

9. Geotechnology
10. Biotechnology/Molecular Separation

11. Fuel Cell General Hydrology
12. Heat Transfer Technology

_______________________________________________________________________
Title: Fluid Conduction Utilizing a Reversible Unsaturated Siphon With Tubarc Porosity Action

ABSTRACT:

A method and system for harnessing an unsaturated flow of fluid utilizing a reversible unsaturated siphon conductor of fluid having a tubarc porous microstructure. Fluid is conducted from a zone of higher (+) fluid matric potential to a zone of lower (-) fluid matric potential utilizing a tubarc porous microstructure. The fluid can be reversibly transported from different zones bearing a differential fluid matric potential according to the status of the fluid matric potential in each zone utilizing the tubarc porous microstructure. The tubarc porous microstructure comprises an enhanced geometric porosity. In this manner, the fluid can be harnessed for irrigation, drainage, filtration, fluid recharging and other fluid delivery uses, such as refilling writing and printing instruments.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Pursuing a balance with NATURE

_____________________________________________________________

Hydrology Breakthrough vs. USPTO Conspiracy


"Violation of science: bad apples and/or systems failure?"

Why Bad Apples Spoil the Barrel?


The Conspiracy – USPTO is running a broad Reinvention Scheme that let Lawyers writing scientific patents and allowing IP rights of issues they are not known in the art!


‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publicationsthan in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.

Food for thought – If an inventor PhD from Harvard can have USPTO issued patents to protect his intellectual property rights but he does NOT understand it, how much the Patent Attorney and Patent Examiner knows about the issue granted protection by US Government. If it holds true, it means that Lawyers know about science more than scientists doAmazing! I just imagine Albert Einstein trying to get patents with his scientific papers .. . It means that those guys in the patenting affairs would handle Theory of Relativity more than him . . . Now I understand why Americans are the leaders of the world . . . awesome, this is simply magical. Mayday Mr. Snowden .  . .mayday mother nature!

My ‘scientific breakthrough’ deals deeply with Hydrogeology/Soil Physics/Hydrology. When I took classes at the Pennsylvania State University of such disciplines during my PhD in Soil Science I remember seeing no single Law student as classmate.

If my patent was being violated I had simple questions to pursue:

·       Was it a casual violation or a clear biased trend?
·       Had the examiner already cited my patent earlier?
·       Did the inventors and examiner have technical-scientific background in the issue?
·       Was the violator a wealthy party?
·       Was the examiner citing my patent to be sure he was granting new claims not claimed before?
·   Why my issued patent was being randomly cited for irrelevant patents and ignored when violated blatantly? 
-------------------



This is the tip of the iceberg as of what lies  bellow, clearly points out distorted conceptions and beliefs on human culture WHEN LAWS OF MAN IGNORE LAWS OF NATURE.


From: Moulis, Thomas <
Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
 
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM 
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents! 
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>

You are a fool--- 

If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it 

Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity

-------------------

"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."


LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):


Thermal/Heat Conductivity                       176.074 pat.

Electric/Electrical Conductivity                139.254 pat.

Hydraulic Conductivity                                  1.329 pat.

Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity                  38 pat.

Wick/wicking                                                      66.415 pat.


The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that  took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.

Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY

Sir Isaac Newton defined the Law of Universal Gravitation in 1687. He was inspired to formulate his theory of gravitation by watching the fall of an apple from a tree.

---------------------------------
De: Owen, Steven [mailto:steven.owen@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION

Mr. Silva, has anyone ever called you a nutcase

Are people out to get you? 

Are you having some trouble keeping up with your medications?


---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology

---------------------------------



Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:

http://youtu.be/E3d-JRg28p8

https://youtu.be/czv2OiiC5wA


_____________________________________________________________


This email from an Emeritus Faculty of Educational Psychology provided valuable insights and feedback showing how deep the academic community is compromised on scientific affairs in the US.They were supposed to know that Darcy’s Law on Hydraulic Conductivity is not written in the US constitution, but endorsed by Mother Nature.


_____________________________________________________________

Nobel Prize is IMPORTANT TO HUMAN KIND, as 50% is business, 40% politics, 5% bad science and 5% good science from an educated abstraction. Nobel Prize Nomination of Economic Science was introduced to pretend that Human Business could overlap nature functioning. THE US AS THE FIRST ECONOMIC POWER IN THE WORLD GRABBED TWO-THIRDS (411/621) OF NOBEL PRIZE NOMINATIONS FOR SCIENCE. Exploratory Analysis shows that the American scientific community has been violating Hydrology science in the Patenting System more than a century, leaving a gap huge enough for a new science Hydrotechnology.  It seems that working with the Chemistry of explosives is far more profitable than the Hydrology of self-watering flower pots. Mr. Alfred Nobel, Arms Dealer, Merchant of Death, and Father of Dynamite, got 355 patents and Albert Einstein got 50 issued patents to portray top scientists claiming intellectual property rights. Obesity, Economic Melt Dow, COVID-19 tragedies, and now Reinvention Policy by USPTO are important evidence of American negligence to science misbalance with Nature.

How much NATURE endorses the Economy and Politics? Sunlight and rain come to us FREE OF CHARGE, regardless of BOUNDARIES, making the Economy not a science, but a distorted human affair as basic Laws of offer and demand is being replaced by GREED and FEAR. Likewise,  recent wars in Ukraine and Israel show us that Politics can’t be science, but a wicked manipulation on human issues wasting innocent lives and spoiling the landscape for weaponry industry profit and disguised interest as Homo sapiens misses simple rationality.

In my neighborhood, I saw the Scientific Police taking pictures of swings I installed on trees for children in the Park during the COVID-19 pandemic lock down. Society try to employ the word SCIENCE for POWER, but there is a misunderstanding as scientific principles claim TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY. Nature is in charge of SCIENCE as there is no POLICE to enforce Nature LAWS. Even religion try to use Scientology for credibility. I like the simple conception that God = Nature. However, Nature writes no books, promises no lands, no life after death, no war or death in name of a divine. In around 4 billions of years of our planet, it seems that we got no aliens to affect our evolution. Most probable we are not leaving our home until the end in 4 to 6 billions of years. Human challenge is to keep nuclear weapons safe, cropping soils, mining our minerals and preserve our home in balance with nature functioning, making our blue planet good for all humans. 

What we see in the universe is just for light travelling.

It seems that few scientists do understand the meaning of their titles PhD as Philosophy Doctor coming from Philosophy of Science (Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science).

_____________________________________________________________


The Conspiracy





Abraham Duncan Stroock
Dept: Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Title: Associate Professor

Education

Ph.D., Harvard University, Chemical Physic (2002)
M.S., University Paris VI and XI,Solid State Physics (1997)
B.A. Cornell UniversityPhysics (1995)


De: Abraham Duncan Stroock [mailto:abe.stroock@cornell.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 22:20
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469

Dear Dr. Silva,
‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications​) than in patentsas the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.

Best regards,

Abe
___________________________________________________________
De: Elson Silva, PhD [mailto:el_silva@uol.com.br]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 23:40
Para: 'Abraham Duncan Stroock'
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu; el_silva@uol.com.br
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Prioridade: Alta

Abe,

You are so naive.

‘…Are you sure you got your PhD at Harvard? ‘

Lawyers learn nothing about Hydrology in Law School.

As far as I know no Law School provides Hydrology teaching . . . No Lawyer could discuss Hydrology having no expertise in the subject!

This is funny!
You do not give your scientific papers to Lawyers, so why are your patents different?
(By the way, was it a Lawyer who wrote your PhD thesis?)

Also, Lawyers are illiterate on the functioning of science, besides most scientists have no idea about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science (Philosophy of Science).

_________________________________________________________________

 TIME ON:

29 years ago, I got PhD in Soil Science at Penn State University, USA, working with

       Spatial Dynamics of Hydrology in the Amazon Basin.

27 years ago, I started playing ADVANCED GARDENING, at home on watering flowerpots

       to ease emotional pressure from INSTITUTIONAL JOB HARASSMENT.

24 years ago, I filed my first American patent believing that the system was genuine

       and HONESTY was a common sense to honor a 'scientific breakthrough', mainly in

       the ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT.

21 years ago, my first patent US 6.766,817 was easily issued by USPTO. deploying the

       technical terminology from my PhD textbooks uncommon in the Patenting System.

10 years ago, I created a new science Hydrotechnology to explore a huge scientific gap 

       ignoring Hydraulic Conductivity on fluidic devices. defining new Hydrodynamic

       Conceptions based on Advanced Artificial Porosity, absent on textbooks.

In 2025 based on updated Hydrodynamics on porosity I set the HYDROLOGY CRADLE TO

        70,000 YEARS AGO starting a new Era of Hydrology by the principle of life.

- For TWO DECADES the principles of ‘tubarc’ to upgrade capillarity has been confirmed by

broad and persistent patent infringement cracking down a sort of Reinvention Policy by USPTO neglecting Hydrology SCIENCE shamefully. This culture degradation is wealthy, obese, sedentary, addict to drugs, vitamins, anti-depressants, electronics, fastfood, etc., becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenic effect. By ignoring science, the US was the leader in human tragedies that lost more citizens to Sars-Cov-2 than all wars combined. Only when hospitals got clogged and collective nocturnal trenched burials, convinced that saving lives was more relevant than making money. So, the American President who recommended Hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid-19 is back pardoning criminals who invaded the US Capitol. How about Presidential Orders to force Americans on HEALTHY LIVESTYLES and HONESTY, mainly on EDUCATIONAL AFFAIRS? China is also waging on DICTARTORSHIP to preserve the culture. As Freedom of Expression is a business aiming at PROFIT, since peace and good deeds are too boring for the media developing businesses, while greedfearambition, and tragedies making the world unbearable is the perfect recipe for a WEALTHY PRESS.